Trickle up – Trickle Down – How (In)Equality Matters

Via Jessica Sherwood on Twitter, what a great representation of the effect of inequality on income. So, let’s play. I used $45,000 income, which is roughly average in the US.

So, at current inequality level in the US:

Now, if we had instead Sweden’s much greater redistribution:

Nice!

On the other hand, if we had levels of inequality comparable to Brazil:

Oh goodness.

Also note how the dials on the right-hand side change as inequalities go up or down.

Your turn.

3 thoughts on “Trickle up – Trickle Down – How (In)Equality Matters

  1. Pingback: Tweets that mention Trickle up – Trickle Down – How (In)Equality Matters | The Global Sociology Blog -- Topsy.com

  2. Never fear, Sweden will catch up, it has had a bourgeois government (whether left or right) ever since the assassination of Palme in 1986, coinciding with the crumbling of the Warsaw Pact. I like the way the presentation shows the relationship between extremes of wealth and poverty and homicide (and no doubt other crimes).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>