The Global Sociology Blog

Via the Independent,

"Ahmet Yildiz, 26, a physics student who represented his country at an international gay gathering in San Francisco last year, was shot leaving a cafe near the Bosphorus strait this week. Fatally wounded, the student tried to flee the attackers in his car, but lost control, crashed at the side of the road and died shortly afterwards in hospital. His friends believe Mr Yildiz was the victim of the country’s first gay honour killing. (…)

Bungled efforts by a religious-minded government to loosen the grip of Turkey’s authoritarian version of secularism have triggered a court case aimed at shutting the ruling party down, with a verdict expected within a month.

Against this backdrop, the issues of women’s rights, sexuality and the place of religion in the public arena have been particularly contentious. Ahmet Yildiz’s crime, his friends say, was to admit openly to his family that he was gay.

"From the day I met him, I never heard Ahmet have a friendly conversation with his parents," one close friend and near neighbour recounted. "They would argue constantly, mostly about where he was, who he was with, what he was doing."

The family pressure increased, the friend explained. "They wanted him to go back home, see a doctor who could cure him, and get married." Shortly after coming out this year, Mr Yildiz went to a prosecutor to complain that he was receiving death threats. The case was dropped. Five months later, he was dead. The police are now investigating his murder. For gay rights groups, the student’s inability to get protection was a typical by-product of the indifference, if not hostility, with which a broad swathe of Turkish society views homosexuality. The military, for example, sees it as an "illness". Men applying for an exemption to obligatory military service on grounds of homosexuality must provide proof – either in the form of an anal examination, or photographs.

"The media ignores or laughs off violence against gays," says Buse Kilickaya, a member of the gay lobbying group Pink Life, adding that Ahmet Yildiz’s death "risks being swept under the carpet and forgotten like other cases in the past". Turkey has a history of honour killings. A government survey earlier this year estimated that one person every week dies in Istanbul as a result of honour killings. It put the nationwide death toll at 220 in 2007. In the majority of cases, the victims are women, but Mr Yildiz’s friends suspect he may be the first recorded victim of a homosexual honour killing.

"We’ve been trying to contact Ahmet’s family since Wednesday, to get them to take responsibility for the funeral," one of the victim’s friends said yesterday, standing outside the morgue where his body has been for three days. "There’s no answer, and I don’t think they are going to come." The refusal of families to bury their relatives is common after honour-related murders.

Mazhar Bagli, a Turkish sociologist who has interviewed 189 people convicted of honour killings, has never heard of a death revolving around homosexuality but has no doubt that it could be used as justification. "Honour killings cleanse illicit relationships. For women, that is a broad term. Men are allowed more sexual freedom, but homosexuality is still seen by some as beyond the pale.""

Whether the victim is man or woman, honor killings are a direct product of patriarchal norms: the refusal by a family member to obey the norms imposed by the male-headed family group. Yildiz’s murder may be investigated because he was a bit of a celebrity. It does not mean it has not happened before and just was not classified as hate crime or honor killing. But this is indeed the correct term.

Behind honor killings is also the denial of individual freedom (especially, again, for women… but then, in such a context, homosexuals are seen as less than men, so, it would place them closer to them in the gender hierarchy). The women’s actions are always seen as reflecting not on their individual status but that of their families. And honor can only be damaged, never increased or improved. A woman or girl can only maintain the honor of her family by being compliant with the dominant patriarchal norms. Her "good" behavior, that is, her obedience, only maintains the status quo but any deviation damages the family’s honor.

With this in mind, it is not hard to see how a gay son would affect the family’s honor in a similar fashion. And there was a way out of this potential shaming of the family, for Yildiz to stay in the closet and ultimately play the hypocritical social game: get married (after a cure).

"So-called "honour killings" continue to be a grim reality wherever conservative social mores resist the rule of law.

In Turkey, a recent government study estimated that around 1,000 honour killings have been committed in the past five years. The victims are mostly young women, murdered by male relatives for transgressing chauvinistic social rules.

Women have been killed for having illicit affairs, talking to strangers, or even for being the victim of rape. Turkey’s justice system has recently increased penalties for honour killings, and ended the practice of allowing murderers to claim family honour as an extenuating circumstance. However, getting a child relative to carry out the killing remains a horrifying way around the law.

The problem is not confined to Turkey. The UN estimates that 5,000 honour killings take place globally every year, from Brazil to Pakistan to Britain. Police estimate more than a dozen honour killings take place in the UK every year, such as the brutal rape and murder of 20-year-old Banaz Mahmod by her uncle and father in 2006, or the murder of Rukhsana Naz, strangled by her family because she wanted a divorce in 1999.

Honour killings have not so far really targeted gay men, although in 2006 a wave of anti-gay killings took place in Iraq, carried out by fanatical Islamist militias. A Jordanian man was shot and wounded by his brother in 2004, apparently for being gay."

Let us be clear then, religious fundamentalism is incompatible with the basic tenets of democratic, liberal governance: respect for the rule of law and basic individual integrity. There is no compromise to be had, no middle ground to be found with ANY religlious fundamentalist groups, whether Muslim or Christian evangelicals. Their attitudes towards women and gay (and they all share that in common) render them incapable of exercising or respecting democratic rule, anywhere.

This is why separation of church and state is not just an article of law but one of the basic pillars of democracy.