Save Sociology at Birmingham

SOS

Sociologist of The Semester

Loïc Wacquant

Kiva

Save Darfur

GlobalGiving

Children International

Free Rice

Help end world hunger

Subscribe by email

Manage Your Subscriptions

Subscribe in a Reader

Categories

 

Blog For Human Rights – No Rebranding, No Outsourcing

May 15th, 2008 by SocProf and tagged ,

Bloggers Unite

Via the Guardian,
“If truth is the first casualty of war, in Washington’s war on terror language proved another early victim. From “the axis of evil” to “enemy combatants”, the warping of words prefigured the bending of legal and military logic. But no lexicographic concoction is quite as sinister as “extraordinary rendition”. The practice can be more plainly described as kidnapping and torture.”
That’s right. Language is important. And only people who commit such acts need such euphemisms. So let’s call things what they are and let’s review the language that matters: the UN International Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.
The first five articles:

Article 1

  1. For the purposes of this Convention, torture means any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him or a third person information or a confession, punishing him for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, or intimidating or coercing him or a third person, or for any reason based on discrimination of any kind, when such pain or suffering is inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in an official capacity. It does not include pain or suffering arising only from, inherent in or incidental to lawful sanctions.
  2. This article is without prejudice to any international instrument or national legislation which does or may contain provisions of wider application.

Article 2

  1. Each State Party shall take effective legislative, administrative, judicial or other measures to prevent acts of torture in any territory under its jurisdiction.
  2. No exceptional circumstances whatsoever, whether a state of war or a threat or war, internal political instability or any other public emergency, may be invoked as a justification of torture.
  3. An order from a superior officer or a public authority may not be invoked as a justification of torture.

Article 3

  1. No State Party shall expel, return (”refouler”) or extradite a person to another State where there are substantial grounds for believing that he would be in danger of being subjected to torture.
  2. For the purpose of determining whether there are such grounds, the competent authorities shall take into account all relevant considerations including, where applicable, the existence in the State concerned of a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant or mass violations of human rights.

Article 4

  1. Each State Party shall ensure that all acts of torture are offences under its criminal law. The same shall apply to an attempt to commit torture and to an act by any person which constitutes complicity or participation in torture.
  2. Each State Party shall make these offences punishable by appropriate penalties which take into account their grave nature.

Article 5

  1. Each State Party shall take such measures as may be necessary to establish its jurisdiction over the offences referred to in article 4 in the following cases:
    1. When the offences are committed in any territory under its jurisdiction or on board a ship or aircraft registered in that State;
    2. When the alleged offender is a national of that State;
    3. When the victim was a national of that State if that State considers it appropriate.
  2. Each State Party shall likewise take such measures as may be necessary to establish its jurisdiction over such offences in cases where the alleged offender is present in any territory under its jurisdiction and it does not extradite him pursuant to article 8 to any of the States mentioned in Paragraph 1 of this article.
  3. This Convention does not exclude any criminal jurisdiction exercised in accordance with internal law.
Can we still call the United States a model of human rights? (Could we ever? No, but it used to be way better than what it is now) Should there be criminal prosecution all the way to the top? You bet.

Posted in Human Rights | 1 Comment »

Create a free edublog to get your own comment avatar (and more!)

One Response to “Blog For Human Rights – No Rebranding, No Outsourcing”

  1.   Dave Donelson Says:

    Thanks for your thoughts on human rights. As the Preamble to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights reminds us, “…recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world.”

    Dave Donelson, author of Heart of Diamonds

    [Reply]

Leave a Reply

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-Spam Image